viernes, enero 25, 2013

Liberation Cassez French, used by Mexican television distractor

The French release of Florence Cassez, accused of belonging to a gang of kidnappers, the prosecution has not proven his innocence, attracted the anger of the Mexican sociedd who feels aggrieved in their rights and violation of Mexican law, to such a degree that social networks have been calls to boycott products and brands of French origin. The main concern is that this case was used by large consortia television to distract the Monex event, company allegedly involved in irregularities in the election process. We present an article that takes up the topic of real interest: The journalist Carmen Aristegui published Friday in the newspaper Reforma an article that discusses the resolution of the Federal Electoral Institute to exonerate the PRI in the cards for Monex, involving triangulation of resources, use of front companies and money dispersion through accounts associated with people linked to the tricolor. Monex Carmen Aristegui F. The case of the financial arrangements with resource triangulation, front companies with revenue-suspicious-and mass dispersion of resources through accounts associated with people linked to the PRI and its campaigns, which marked the presidential race last year and allowed the massive flow indeterminate amounts to election campaigns in the country, known as Monex Monexgate or event, is about to become watered down. The completion of the draft resolution by the Control Unit Resources Political Party and its relief and vote in the General Council of the IFE has left a bitter taste in my mouth. Serious doubts have been left on the independence and scope in the tasks of supervision, scrutiny and sanction of what happens in political campaigns in Mexico, because of what happened last Wednesday. The exemption to the PRI, having much matter to the contrary, is a very bad sign that will not necessarily be corrected when resolving the challenges filed already announced for the Electoral Tribunal. The explanation on the origin, destination and application of massively dispersed resources Monex cards for PRI campaigns is, in the first point, unlikely. In the second and third, there was simply no explanation. The PRI fielded the questions about the origin of resources by presenting copies of bank transfers for nearly 50 million, plus interest, made in favor of the company `Alkino. And Quality Services, SA de CV `For services rendered to that political institute` ... service concept development, design and implementation of business solution ', by `concept' funding and payment of prepaid cards delivered. The PRI says Alkino contracted services, who in turn hired the company Atama, who in turn hired Inizzio company, Monex who billed for services rendered for hiring electronic purses that were used -anonymously-to disperse millions of dollars to the campaign of the PRI. The PRI says that the origin of money is the PRI itself and that is found to payments made from July 13-and-loose with the scandal and until 9 August, Alkino deposits for the tip Boot brokerage that structure. Why such triangulation? The PRI could, if resources were hers, who would contract with financial services or the distribution directly. Why use a Alkino-Atama-InizzioEfra-Monex to buy just a few purses? Intermediadoras companies that resorted to the PRI are full of irregularities starting prestanombres shareholder structures composed, leading to people related to the PRI and the campaign. The audit authority gave good explanation of the PRI. Counselors also and gave way to debate whether to punish the party, and not by the origin and legality-but only by the destination of the money. But even that succeeded. Since the PRI did not explain how these resources were used, the counselor Figueroa party proposed a fine of 75 million. Discussed, voted and tied about that fine (4-4). The unusual scene came when he appeared on the lawyer and former secretary general of the PRI and former candidate of that party to the presidency of Mexico, Sergio Garcia Ramirez, who had decided to announce itself-always-participate in the relief and Monexgate vote. Ramirez Garcia abandoned his initial stance of not getting involved in the issue given its longstanding friendship with the Fraga family, whose members are linked to the company `Efra` (Emilio initial Fraga), one of the companies that billed for millions Monex pesos reward purses Most surprising is that none of the directors-García Ramírez who granted them power to inconformarse-have prevented that vote favored the PRI exemption. He said Garcia Ramirez had no legal impediment to voting and will be given free passage followed the cheers for the jurist. Nobody asked him to be consistent with its original position and can avoid it, the four directors who said go for the fine were outvoted. While the entire country followed the details of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Florence Cassez and occupied large spaces that the case merits, alongside the debate unfolded-for hours-led directors to vote on a waiver for the PRI. Suspecting that someone measured the desirability of matching for the same date, the resolution of the case Monex with the French is a matter we leave only the evil-minded. The claims of the opposition parties have not been slow in coming. Left in the Electoral Tribunal what happens with these complaints. Left in the hands of authorities who would have themselves investigated the fate of the views submitted by the election authority.

No hay comentarios: